Post

After the recent Paris Olympics controversy surrounding Algerian boxer, Imane Khelif and Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, we want to explore Gender eligibility tests, also known as sex verification or gender verification tests, are the procedures used in sports to determine an athlete's eligibility to compete in a gender-specific category. These tests aim to ensure fair competition by verifying that athletes competing in women's events are biologically female. The history, methods, and implications of these tests are complex and often controversial, as we see today with the outcry over the women’s boxing events in this summer’s Olympic games. Let’s explore the key points:

A Brief History

Early Methods:

Initially, visual inspections and physical examinations were used in the mid-20th century to determine an athlete's gender. These methods were often invasive and uncomfortable, leading to significant backlash from athletes and advocates. Who really wants to have Olympic committee members doing visual and physical examinations of their genitals? People don’t even like having to go through TSA checkpoints let alone something as invasive as this.

Chromosomal Testing:

In the 1960s, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) introduced chromosomal testing, which examined an athlete's sex chromosomes to confirm they were XX (female) or XY (male). This method seemed more scientific but still faced criticism for not accounting for intersex variations among individuals. Chromosomal tests, also known as karyotyping, are used to examine an individual's chromosomes to identify genetic conditions, including determining sex chromosomes (XX for females and XY for males). The most common method involves drawing a blood sample from the individual. Other sources can include amniotic fluid (for prenatal testing), bone marrow, or other tissues. The collected sample is then sent to a laboratory for processing. There are several types of Chromosomal Tests such as:

1.   G-Banding Karyotype:

The standard method that uses Giemsa staining to create a banding pattern on the chromosomes, allowing for the identification of chromosomal abnormalities and sex determination by scientists.

2.   Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH):

A more advanced technique that uses fluorescent probes to bind to specific chromosome regions. This method allows for the detection of specific genetic disorders and anomalies.

3.   Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH):

A technique that compares the DNA of the test sample with a reference sample to identify gains or losses of chromosome segments.

4.   Array CGH (aCGH):

A more detailed version of CGH that uses microarrays to detect smaller chromosomal abnormalities at a higher resolution.

Evolving Standards:

Over time, the scientific understanding of sex and gender has evolved, leading to changes in the methods and criteria used for gender verification. These changes have been driven by advances in genetics and endocrinology, as well as a growing recognition of the rights of athletes. Sometimes different governing bodies have different rules and opinions regarding these athletes as we see in this summers Olympic games.

‍

The International Boxing Association (IBA) disqualified female boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting for failure to meet “eligibility rules.”, however both were permitted to compete by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in the 2024 Summer games in Paris where the Algerian athlete eventually won gold in her weight class.  The conservative backlash erupted after Khelif's dramatic victory over Angela Carini of Italy on Thursday. The match ended just 46 seconds in when Khelif’s powerful punches dislodged Carini's chinstrap and bloodied her shorts, prompting Carini to quit. Falling to her knees in the ring, Carini sobbed and refused to shake hands with Khelif.

"I have never been hit so hard in my life," Carini tearfully told reporters. She explained that she stopped fighting due to nose pain but emphasized it wasn’t her place to judge whether Khelif should compete.

"If an athlete is this way, and in that sense it’s not right or it is right, it’s not up to me to decide," Carini added. Khelif briefly addressed the media, telling BBC Sport, "I'm here for the gold — I fight everybody."

Taiwanese boxer Lin Yu-ting has secured a medal by defeating Bulgaria's Svetlana Kamenova Staneva in the women's 57kg quarterfinals on Sunday, August 4^th, 2024. Lin has been embroiled in controversy throughout this year's Olympic boxing event. The International Boxing Federation (IBA) stated at last year's world championships that she had failed an unspecified eligibility test, but has not provided further details. The controversy persisted after the bout when Staneva mocked Lin by making an "X" sign with her fingers in the ring. The Bulgarian Olympic Team confirmed in a Facebook post that Staneva's gesture was meant to declare herself as a woman with two X chromosomes.

Lin, meanwhile, expressed gratitude to her coaches for their training and sacrifices, acknowledging the time they spent away from their families. She also thanked her fans in Taiwan and promised to respond to the numerous messages she received on social media after the Olympics.

‍

Modern Methods of Gender Testing

Chromosomal Testing:

Testing sex chromosomes (XX for females, XY for males). While this method was more objective than visual inspections, it still did not account for intersex variations and other conditions such as Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS), where an individual may have XY chromosomes but develop as female. Intersex variations, or differences in sex development (DSDs), refer to conditions where an individual's reproductive or sexual anatomy doesn't fit typical male or female definitions. These variations can involve chromosomes, gonads, hormones, or genitalia, and include conditions like Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS), Turner Syndrome, Klinefelter Syndrome, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), and 5-Alpha-Reductase Deficiency. These variations can result in ambiguous genitalia or mixed secondary sexual characteristics, complicating traditional gender labeling. Legal and social challenges, ethical considerations around medical interventions, and the importance of informed consent and bodily autonomy are critical issues for intersex individuals.

Hormonal Testing:

Measuring testosterone levels in athletes, particularly in women, to ensure they fall within a range typically expected for females. This method is widely used but controversial. It has been adopted by various sports organizations, including the IOC and World Athletics, with specific thresholds set to define eligibility. Normal testosterone levels in women vary depending on factors such as age, menstrual cycle phase, and individual health. Generally, the typical normal range for total testosterone levels in women is: Adult Women (19-49 years old): Approximately 15-70 nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL) or 0.5-2.4 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L). Postmenopausal Women: Levels may fall between 10-60 ng/dL or 0.3-2.1 nmol/L.

These ranges can vary slightly between different labs and medical guidelines. Additionally, free testosterone, which is the fraction of testosterone not bound to proteins in the blood, is also measured but in much lower quantities. Typical ranges for free testosterone are about 0.1-1.5 nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL) or 0.003-0.05 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L). In men, the levels are much higher and Testosterone Therapy is often banned for competitors, despite its popularity.

‍

Physical Examination:

Less common in today’s major sporting events and with their respective governing bodies, but physical exams were previously used to assess secondary sexual characteristics. This method is now considered outdated and inappropriate due to its invasive nature and better methods exist.

Genetic Testing:

More advanced genetic testing can identify specific genetic markers related to sex determination. This approach provides a more nuanced understanding of an athlete's biology but also raises privacy and ethical concerns. However it must be stated that for fairness within women’s sporting events, there isn’t a definite understanding among all officials and participants that allows for a clear path forward regarding participation of all athletes.

Controversies and Issues

Privacy and Dignity:

Gender eligibility tests can invade an athlete's privacy and dignity, subjecting them to scrutiny and stigmatization. Athletes undergoing these tests often feel their personal and medical information is exposed and judged, leading to significant emotional and psychological stress. In the 2024 Summer Olympics, the major headlines ae now revolving around Algerian boxer, Imane Khelif and her sex at birth, genetics and disorders. As an athlete you just want to compete and now this has turned into an entirely different battle for here. On the flip side, it’s unfair to women to have to compete against athletes that have an unfair genetic or biological advantage, which is why some of these tests are being conducted in the first place.

Biological Complexity:

Sex determination is biologically complex and not strictly binary. Intersex conditions and variations in sex development (DSDs) can complicate clear categorization. For example, some individuals may have atypical chromosomal patterns or hormone levels that do not fit neatly into male or female categories. These are relatively rare but when they do come up it raises serious questions regarding eligibility and so far, there are no clear answers.

Fairness vs. Inclusion:

Balancing fair competition with the inclusion of all athletes, including those with DSDs or transgender athletes, is a contentious issue. There is ongoing debate about how to ensure a level playing field while respecting the identities and rights of all competitors. Its not fair to someone born with a chromosome disorder who is a biological female in all aspects besides what a chromosome tests says, to deny them the right to compete and it’s also unfair to female athletes to have to compete against a bigger, stronger biological male. What is the best solution?

Human Rights:

The ethics of gender testing and the potential discrimination against athletes based on their biological differences have raised significant human rights concerns. Many advocates argue that these tests are inherently discriminatory and violate the principles of equality and dignity. Others suggest that if you want to compete in the Olympics, you forego certain rights of privacy in the name of fairness in sports.

‍

Current Practices

International Regulations:

Different sports governing bodies, such as the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and the IOC, have their own regulations and criteria for gender eligibility. These regulations often include testosterone thresholds and specific guidelines for athletes with DSDs. They also collide with other regulatory bodies such as the   FIFA, World Athletics (International Association of Athletics Federations), FIBA, FINA, International Tennis Federation, United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC), National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), International Paralympic Committee (IPC) to name a few. These bodies make their own rules so there may be some confusion regarding eligibility when athletes enter competitions not sanctioned by a specific regulatory board.

Case-by-Case Basis:

Increasingly, decisions on gender eligibility are being made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the individual circumstances of each athlete. This approach allows for more personalized and fair assessments but can also lead to inconsistency and confusion. The wide range of medical complications that each individual athlete make it near impossible to have a black and white protocol on how to deal with the complex scenarios that we see play out from time to time.

Legal and Ethical Challenges:

Athletes who have been subjected to gender testing have sometimes taken legal action against sports organizations, challenging the fairness and legality of the tests. High-profile cases have brought significant attention to these issues and prompted calls for reform. One example is that of South African middle-distance runner Caster Semenya who has been involved in a prolonged legal battle over the regulation of her testosterone levels. The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), now World Athletics, imposed rules that required female athletes with naturally high testosterone levels to lower them to compete in certain events. Semenya has challenged these regulations in court, arguing they were discriminatory and violated her human rights. Her case has been taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. World Athletics, the governing body for track and field, has stated that Semenya’s testosterone levels provide her with an athletic advantage similar to that of a male athlete competing in women’s events, thus necessitating specific regulations. Critics of these rules, which were introduced in 2011 and have since become more stringent, argue that naturally high testosterone levels should be seen as a genetic advantage rather than a disadvantage.

‍

Testosterone Testing in Olympic Athletes

In recent years, testosterone tests performed on Olympic athletes have primarily focused on measuring the levels of testosterone in the blood to determine eligibility for female competition categories. These tests aim to ensure a fair playing field, particularly in women's events, by addressing concerns about competitive advantages linked to naturally high testosterone levels. Indian sprinter Dutee Chand faced intense scrutiny and was excluded from the 2014 Commonwealth Games due to elevated testosterone levels. After undergoing multiple tests, she challenged the international track federation in court, contesting the regulations that imposed limits on female athletes' naturally occurring testosterone levels. Chand successfully appealed her exclusion at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, allowing her to compete in various championships, including the 2016 and 2020 (held in 2021 due to the pandemic) Olympic Games.

Purpose of Testosterone Testing

Competitive Fairness:

To maintain fair competition by ensuring that athletes in female categories do not have an undue advantage due to elevated testosterone levels. Testosterone is known to enhance muscle mass, strength, and endurance, which can provide a significant competitive edge. For those women with naturally elevated testosterone levels, they may be at a competitive advantage, however if these naturally occurring levels are out of their control, can they be excluded from sport? What is the cutoff? Who gets to decide? What about men? Can their testosterone levels be too high? Were not talking about exogenous, performance enhancing drugs or steroids, but rather their naturally occurring hormone levels. Should having diets that are optimized to increase testosterone production be banned as well? How far should this go?

‍

Regulatory Compliance:

To comply with regulations set by sport’s governing bodies such as the IOC and World Athletics. These organizations have established specific guidelines and thresholds to standardize the testing process. The problem is when two organizations have different guidelines which we are seeing now, and thus seeing the controversies erupt.

Testing Procedures

Blood Sample Collection:

A blood sample is taken from the athlete, usually through venipuncture. This procedure is straightforward but requires careful handling to ensure accuracy and reliability. Recently, Twenty-three top Chinese swimmers tested positive for a potent banned substance seven months before the Tokyo 2021 Olympic Games. Despite this, they avoided public scrutiny and continued to compete after senior Chinese officials discreetly cleared them of doping, and the global anti-doping authority chose not to intervene. Several of these athletes, including nearly half of China’s swimming team at the Tokyo Games, went on to win medals, including three golds. Many are still competing for China, and some, like two-time gold medalist Zhang Yufei, are expected to be strong contenders at this year’s Summer Games in Paris.

China’s antidoping regulator acknowledged the positive tests in a report, claiming the swimmers had ingested the banned substance unintentionally and in very small amounts, and therefore no further action was deemed necessary.

Laboratory Analysis: The sample is analyzed in a lab to measure the concentration of testosterone, using: Immunoassays: Commonly used for initial screening to measure hormone levels. These tests are relatively quick and cost-effective. Mass Spectrometry: For more precise quantification, often used to confirm initial test results. This method is highly accurate but more expensive and time-consuming. Threshold Levels: Athletes' testosterone levels are compared against established thresholds (often around 5 nanomoles per liter for female athletes). Levels above this may prompt further investigation and potential interventions.

Eligibility Criteria

Testosterone Thresholds:

Female athletes with naturally high testosterone levels (hyperandrogenism) above the set limit may need to lower their levels to compete in women's events, often through medical interventions like hormone-suppressing medications. Many women actually take Testosterone as a form of hormone replacement therapy due to its many benefits. This requirement has sparked significant debate about fairness and health. If they don’t disqualify basketball players for being naturally tall, is it fair to DQ a female with high natural testosterone levels? There is a difference between steroids and natural hormone levels.

Duration:

Athletes may need to demonstrate sustained low testosterone levels over a specific period, typically six months, before being allowed to compete. This criterion ensures that the hormonal adjustment is stable and not just a temporary measure.

‍

Controversies and Considerations

Ethical Concerns:

The practice of regulating testosterone levels has been criticized for its impact on athletes' privacy, bodily autonomy, and human rights. Many argue that these regulations impose unfair burdens on athletes and violate their right to compete based on their natural abilities. On the other side, many female athletes argue that its unfair for them to compete against biological men who have a clear biological advantage over them and who should be competing against other biological men.

Intersex and DSD Athletes:

The regulations particularly affect athletes with Differences in Sex Development (DSDs), who may naturally have higher testosterone levels. These athletes often face difficult choices and significant pressure to conform to regulatory standards which may be following outdated rules/protocols. Should there be a hearing board created to listen to these cases on a case by case basis?

Health Implications:

Concerns about the health implications of requiring athletes to undergo hormone therapy to lower testosterone levels. Hormone-suppressing treatments can have side effects and long-term health consequences, raising questions about the ethics of such interventions. Its not fair to ask an athlete to put themselves in harms way over naturally occurring endocrine levels that are out of their control.

Legal Challenges:

Some athletes have legally challenged these regulations, arguing they are discriminatory and not based on sound science. Legal battles have highlighted the complexities and inconsistencies in current policies, prompting calls for more comprehensive and equitable solutions. Courts will have a difficult time navigating these uncharted waters and will need to take into account the athlete’s human rights, fairness to the competitors, regulatory governance, legal historical rulings to ensure a just approach and outcome for all.

‍

Recent Developments

Case-by-Case Evaluations:

Sports governing bodies are moving towards more individualized assessments rather than blanket policies. This approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of each athlete's situation and reduces the risk of unjust exclusion. This seems to be the best approach to address such complex variations amongst athletes.

Ongoing Research:

Continued research is being conducted to better understand the relationship between testosterone levels and athletic performance, as well as to develop fairer and more inclusive policies. Studies aim to refine the criteria for eligibility and address the diverse needs of athletes to be as fair to all competitors as possible. Clearly, testosterone aids in muscle growth and recovery and will be a significant influence in athletic achievement, the question is how to regulate the natural production in athletes.

Impact on Women in the Olympics

The implementation of gender eligibility and testosterone testing has had a profound impact on women in the Olympics. While the intention behind these tests is to ensure fair competition, the reality is that they have created a complex and often contentious environment for female athletes. The goal is to ensure that all athletes are starting off on a fair playing field. Clearly advocates for women’s sports want to ensure that no men are taking spots and opportunity away from women, such as the claim made against NCAA swimmer Lia Thomas, a biological male who transitioned to female and began swimming against and defeating women in NCAA competitions, including winning a national championship. She recently lost a legal battle which she tried to be eligible to compete against women in the Olympics.

‍

Psychological and Emotional Impact

For many female athletes, undergoing gender verification and testosterone testing is a deeply invasive process that can lead to significant psychological and emotional stress. The scrutiny and stigmatization associated with these tests can affect an athlete's self-esteem and mental health. Athletes who are flagged for high testosterone levels often face public speculation and criticism, which can be incredibly damaging to their emotional wellbeing.

Competitive Disadvantage

Some female athletes feel that the focus on testosterone levels creates an uneven playing field by penalizing those with naturally high levels of the hormone. These athletes argue that their natural physiology should not be considered an unfair advantage any more than other genetic attributes like height or muscle fiber composition. The requirement to undergo hormone-suppressing treatments can also affect performance, as these treatments may have side effects that impair an athlete's physical capabilities. This certainly limits the potential of an athletes compared to the rest of the field.

Legal and Ethical Challenges

High-profile cases, such as those of South African runner Caster Semenya and Indian sprinter Dutee Chand, have brought international attention to the issue of testosterone testing and how these cases should be handled. These athletes have challenged the regulations in court, arguing that they are discriminatory and violate their human rights. Their cases have sparked widespread debate and prompted calls for changes to the policies governing gender eligibility. Opponents say that they are necessary to ensure equality and fairness in women’s sporting events.

‍

Advocacy and Reform

In response to the controversies surrounding gender eligibility and testosterone testing, there has been a growing movement advocating for the rights of female athletes. Organizations such as Athlete Ally and the Women's Sports Foundation have called for more inclusive and scientifically sound policies. These groups argue that the current regulations are based on outdated and overly simplistic notions of sex and gender, and they advocate for approaches that recognize the full spectrum of human diversity. Unfortunately, it’s not likely that a resolution will be made anytime in the near future. As the debate continues, it is clear that the future of gender eligibility and testosterone testing will require careful consideration of both scientific evidence and ethical principles. Sports organizations must balance the need for fair competition with the individual rights of all competitors.

‍